Prediction of Constantin Schmitz vs Daniel De Jonge Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Schmitz vs D. De Jonge

Constantin Schmitz
GER
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
26
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
881
552
Best Rank
870
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Daniel De Jonge
NED
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
26
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
881
552
Best Rank
870
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Schmitz 1 - 0 Jonge
They have played 2 sets in total, with Constantin Schmitz winning 2 and Daniel De Jonge winning 0. The last match between Constantin Schmitz and Daniel De Jonge was at the M15 Troisdorf, 09-05-2019, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Constantin Schmitz getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schmitz | 1 |
| Jonge | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Troisdorf(05-09-19)
Constantin Schmitz
6
6
Daniel De Jonge
3
1
C. Schmitz vs D. D. Jonge H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.75% (79-43) | Career Total W/L | 55.42% (133-107) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Schmitz vs D. D. Jonge Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Constantin Schmitz has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Daniel De Jonge has won 44.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Constantin Schmitz, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel De Jonge has won 46.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 22.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Constantin Schmitz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel De Jonge has saved 48.40% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Constantin Schmitz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Daniel De Jonge winning 60.00% (W/L 33/22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Constantin Schmitz has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/12). Daniel De Jonge has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 27/17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 54/51).
- Player level: In the last year, Constantin Schmitz has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Daniel De Jonge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.00% of matches (W/L 33/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Constantin Schmitz winning 1 times and Daniel De Jonge being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Constantin Schmitz winning 2 and Daniel De Jonge winning 0.
- The last match between Constantin Schmitz and Daniel De Jonge was at the M15 Troisdorf, 09-05-2019, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Constantin Schmitz getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Constantin Schmitz has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Daniel De Jonge has played against players with an average rank of 317.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Constantin Schmitz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel De Jonge has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Constantin Schmitz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel De Jonge has converted 24.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Constantin Schmitz vs Daniel De Jonge Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Schmitz vs D. D. Jonge H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:19:0 | Average Match Time | 1:19:0 |
| 59% (36/61) | 1st Serve % | 49% (28/57) |
| 69% (25/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (17/28) |
| 64% (16/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
| 51% (29/57) | Return Points Win % | 33% (20/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Schmitz 0%, Jonge 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Schmitz 0%, Jonge 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Schmitz 0%, Jonge 60%.
C. Schmitz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 5-7 6-0 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
D. D. Jonge Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||

C. Schmitz vs D. D. Jonge Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.75% (79/43) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.42% (133/107) |
| 63.30% (169/98) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.08% (285/242) |
| 56.23% (1323/1030) | Games Win/Loss | 51.67% (2574/2408) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.16% (41/32) |
| 67.06% (57/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.43% (54/51) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.29% (38/24) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 175 | Aces Total | 638 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 468 | Total Double Faults | 925 |
| 1:14:34 | Average Match Time | 1:10:4 |
| 519.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 354.17 |
| 61% (3778/6169) | 1st Serve % | 55% (5954/10904) |
| 65% (2455/3778) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (4171/5954) |
| 44% (1041/2391) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2258/4950) |
| 46% (397/866) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (484/1146) |
| 47% (2971/6305) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4529/11146) |
| 64.75% (79/43) | Futures W/L | 55.42% (133/107) |
| 64% (77/120) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (129/235) |
| 50% (9/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (26/47) |
| 48% (12/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (28/53) |
| 92% (78/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (129/116) |
| 8% (78/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (129/13) |
| 16% (44/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (110/15) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction11:35 PM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
01:05
H2H 0-0
01:05
H2H 0-0
01:45
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece